British bank Barclays has announced that boss Antony Jenkins has been ousted from his job by a disgruntled board just three years after he was promoted to the job in the wake of the Libor scandal. Jenkins is being replaced for now by chairman John McFarland following unrest over the board’s desire for bigger cost cuts and more focus on the investment bank’s performance. Read more…
The Shanghai composite index has plummeted by 6% as panic selling continues to wipe trillions of dollars off the value of Chinese-listed companies. Despite the government’s efforts to stem the tide by relaxing borrowing rules and cutting fees, shares have dropped to less than a third of their June peak. Read more…
With tensions high in Europe as it faces its biggest crisis since the union, questions are being asked about the viability of giving the green light a third bailout for the Greek economy. But what happened to the hundreds of billions of Euros of financial assistance delivered in the wake of the global crisis of 2008? Read more…
British bank faces fresh fines
Barclays has had to carve another £800m off the bank’s bottom line to pay its share of the international forex rigging scandal and to settle further compensation claims for mis-selling payment protection insurance to customers. The bank’s penalties will total around £2bn from regulators in the UK and US charged with investigating the manipulation of the £3.5tn-a-day forex markets. Read more…
German Chancellor, Angela Merkel didn’t become the most powerful leader in Europe by being a pushover. Merkel’s government is dominating European politics at the moment, so you might wonder what response Greek Prime Minister, Alex Tsipras, was expecting to his demands for Nazi war reparations at their meeting this week. One can only imagine that Frau Merkel delivered a frosty ‘Nein’, before going on to say that ‘in the view of the German government, the issue of reparations is politically and legally closed.’
We wrote in January “any material pullback that could make 2012′s chart look like a V or W on renewed European default or earnings concerns is a buying opportunity.” The correction is here, live and in person with global markets retracing 2012’s gains to date. The V can certainly deepen further, but this is the time to begin putting some of the cash you have on the sidelines to work.
The timing of the bottom of this correction is irrelevant and don’t expect to get it right. Just start putting 10-20% of your cash to work on days when the market is down over 2%. If we fall just another 5-7% from here, I will advise swapping out your boring, broad ETFs for something more fun like 2x or 3x leveraged ETFs and emerging markets exposure with more upside.
Corrections are psychological animals and we are definitely in the midst of a Euro-led psychosis. The faster Greece is resolved (stay with Germany’s austerity plan or leave the Euro) and Spain performs an Italian-esque political and economic turnabout, the better. But since the timing of this correction is identical to those we saw in 2010 and 2011, we are in no big hurry to get overexcited that the worst is behind us. The US economy is in a rough patch driven by the confidence-killing psychosis across the Atlantic. Notice nobody is worried about France’s new left-leaning leader or the actual Euro currency which is still far from parity with the US Dollar. All this negativity will pass and the stock market will show its strong hand again as we get closer to the Presidential election. Markets cheer political deadlock so bet on Republican gains in Congress and another four years for President Obama.
I have a wealthy friend who asked the following question today: What are the odds of Google and Apple hitting $1,000/share, respectively, in the coming 18-30 months?
I don’t have a clue, but it doesn’t seem too far fetched. Which stock will get there first? No idea. This is a great topic to remind ourselves about luxury goods from Econ 101. Between Google’s IPO in 2004 until 2007, investors couldn’t get enough – it outpaced the tech-heavy NASDAQ 100 index by 3-4x over that period. The higher the price went, the more investors demanded shares of GOOG.
This price action was no different than what you see with Louis Vuitton purses, Rolex watches, Ferraris, and trendy art. But in 2008, GOOG changed its behavior and began trading like a technology stock rather than a sought-after purse. Over the past three years, AAPL has traded in similar fashion with similar results. This week even as Eurozone worries returned to the forefront of market action, AAPL seemed to defy gravity.
High net worth folks (politicians call them the 1%) around the globe flaunt their Apple shares at parties like a gold Rolex or red Ferrari. Look at me, look at me. The more AAPL stock makes up of your liquid net worth, the cooler you feel now. This has nothing to do with ratios or earnings or any fundamentals at all since these folks could care less about them – this is about being cool and envied. I don’t know how to time when AAPL stops acting like a luxury good, but I bet it will someday sooner than later. Sadly, there just isn’t any reason to bet against it for now. When it stops acting special, you will know.
Meanwhile, I take the road less traveled. So long as the bull market is in place for 2012, I choose to own QLD or TQQQ which offer 2x or 3x the daily return of the tech-heavy QQQ ETF, respectively. Because AAPL is the single most influential stock inside the QQQ ETF now, these leveraged ETFs will better mimic its potential for continued ascent. If it loses its luxury luster along the way, even better.
It’s February and the weather in Southern California is reminiscent of spring. Birds are singing, the ocean is glassy, and the sky is blue – it’s a nice feeling. This is appropriate given the spring awakening stocks enjoyed so far in 2012. Luckily there remain many negative headlines and bearish doubters out there, so we may have some room to run with this rally before an inevitable correction a.k.a gut check.
My timing isn’t always great, so if you’re just now diving into stocks, it may be wise to hold off for a meaningful correction. The fears that caused me to reduce equity exposure last fall perfectly coincided with the bottom in global equities so I still feel a little pain from that error. But I followed my gut that if things didn’t play out as I expected by the end of 2011, I had to admit error and return to a more bullish positioning. Now 2011’s tiny gain in the S&P 500 Index is followed up so far year-to-date with a 7% pop , but beaten-down European shares are up a few extra percentage points over US stocks, the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 is up 11% along with small cap US stocks (Russell 2000 Index), and risky emerging markets are up over 15% (MSCI Emerging Markets Index). Gold is mostly keeping up with the broad stock indices much to my chagrin.
I know, I know, I have been quiet. But for good reason. The market is behaving like a roller coaster and investors have indigestion from the volatility. Talking heads only add to it. My September 12, 2011 call for a significant easing off the investment accelerator pedal has felt right, wrong and anywhere in-between so many times I should feel dizzy. That day I said “The market may be giving a signal that a sharp drop is ahead and risky assets could drop 1.5-3x more than the broad market.” We have had three valleys, two peaks and lots of up and down in little more than three months. Europe and the global banks underperformed at first, but are now outperforming other sectors and countries. One bright spot has been my gold call: “Another theory is that gold is reflecting future relative dollar strength to a basket of global currencies. Either way, it probably makes sense to get out of its way.” Avoiding it or being short one of the gold ETFs has been profitable and offset pain elsewhere. The issue at hand is what to do now and we shall get to that.
While the broad US stock market will end 2011 darn near flat to up a little, most investments that outperformed in the bounce since the bear market bottom performed poorly. Emerging markets and developed markets outside the US fell 15-20%. Europe and its euro currency were the worst offenders. Technology stocks lagged the broad market. The volatility since August has been so potent I heard a man in his sixties complain about it to a clerk at my local grocery store. Buy and hold investors with a mostly US-focused portfolio have done just fine so far, but the traders among us are just about ready to throw up. Hedge funds are feeling the pain the most as they are whipsawed from low to high, to subsequent low, to the next high. They are at the mercy of psychology and trend-following no less than the average investor/trader.
If you followed my advice, you should have ~25% cash to burn at this point. Stop day trading (you know who you are) and add a bit to those broad, large and small cap US index funds you own and keep your now reduced exposure to emerging markets and non-US developed markets in case a bounce happens. As I said in September, “Poor stock market performance in the fourth year of a President’s term is rare as can be.” Please don’t think for a second the volatility is over. A plausible scenario for 2012 is a W shaped year with one or two shocks causing steep drops in the first and second quarters, followed by a nice rally into the election and an overall 10-20% S&P 500 return. I expect the market to trick us into believing 2012 is like awful 2008, an anomaly for a fourth year in the election cycle, at least a few times in the near future. But 2012 will buck the trend because stocks hate the uncertainty that goes along with legislation which creates winners and losers. Losers hate losing more than winners like winning – this keeps stocks from rising when the prospect of big legislative change is at hand. Election years like 2012 yield little in the way of change and President Obama has no real competition at this point. Regardless of your political leanings, Romney is no more a contender for President than John Kerry two elections ago. Fourth years for lame ducks are even better historically. There is good reason to believe Obama is essentially a lame duck to his own second term, especially if you watched the Republican debates so far.
Europe could throw a monkey wrench into our plans for a good year and help create a W chart, but the US should continue to do better than foreign markets if for no other reason than the strength of the US Dollar. Our economy is also recovering nicely from the recession, but not fantastically. Beating expectations is a win even if your wallet doesn’t feel as high and mighty as it did in 2005-06. Hedge funders like SAC Capital are even betting on a real estate stock rebound in 2012 which seems a tad premature. Tech stocks should gain leadership once again as risk appetites return, but don’t bet on that in the first half of next year. A strengthening USD should keep gold prices falling as speculators exit their long-held positions to lock in profits. If some brainy solution to European banks’ sovereign debt problems arises out of the blue, we could see things reverse with the US lagging again and gold moving up. Until then, maintain an 80-90% allocation to stocks with the remainder short gold or in cash.
Good Luck and Happy New Year!!!
No, not Steve Jobs. I know you love to hear about your favorite stock Apple Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL). It sure has defied gravity and the market as a whole, despite news of Amazon’s tablet competitor and global demand worries. I like AAPL, but I wouldn’t build my portfolio around it solely based on the fact that it’s your grandma’s, uncle’s and next door neighbor’s favorite stock too. That means any stumble on its path to even greater global domination could be exaggerated. On to more important things… Congress and Obama want to fix the dismal US JOBS picture. But how? Probably not the way they want to do it and not the way they will try to do it.
Ben Bernanke is going around telling people unemployment is a national crisis. He is also saying he doesn’t have the tools to help. Congress wants to create government programs to “retool” or retrain the labor pool. They also want to give businesses a tax break. Sounds good on the surface. But how does that help get demand going for the products and services businesses provide? What about hiring – will these measures actually cause hiring? I will speculate a little.
As a small business owner, I know what it takes to get me to hire a new employee. Promises of more demand from the government won’t do it. Now if the phone starts ringing and old clients start asking about new programs, that’s a different story. How about a lower payroll tax? I think this is a waste. Small business owners aren’t making the kind of profits they would like these days, so that little extra money will go right into the S Corp owner’s pocket. What about big business? Giving them tax breaks right now is pure nonsense. They have the cash to hire if they want. So if Uncle Sam focuses on small businesses, how can he help? Money, that’s how! Congress should pick up the tab for new workers and IT CAN.
Let’s work through a reasonable scenario: Congress can spend $48 billion over the next 24 months to create one million new jobs. So we add to the national debt – it’s $14 trillion already. This money is peanuts compared to what we spend fighting the Taliban and securing Iraq and the bailout we gave big banks a few years ago. The math is easy. Start with $2 billion a month. That’s 20,000 salaried employees making $50,000 a year for two years. Since Congress won’t agree to foot the entire bill for a new employee, let’s cover 50% of each new employee’s wages for two years. Now we created 40,000 long-term positions in a month. Let’s do this for 24 straight months and we only spent $48 billion to generate 960,000 jobs. We can probably double that easily and spend $100 billion to put 2 million people to work.
Let’s open this program only to businesses with under $100 million in revenue to make sure it hits its intended target. Put a cap in place on the number of employees a business can hire under the program and you have something raw, but relatively viable. I can tell you with certainty that small business owners will start hiring if they know a 50% tax credit is coming for their new employee for two straight years. Call your congressman